MET COAL SERIES: Metallurgical coal's gradual change of guard in spot market influence

Banner Image

This five-part story series examines the coking coal market from a few angles. This first part focuses on pricing evolution and spot liquidity. The second analyzes how trade flows have changed, the third traces the rising importance of environment, social and governance criteria, while the fourth takes a deep dive into the workings of coal trading platforms that may inform spot price assessments. The final part examines the current state of the spot market and explores directions for future evolution.

Shifts in the way a commodity is priced often result from major economic and world events and coking coal is no exception, having witnessed the pricing mechanism for long-term contracts move from annual negotiations toward spot-linked pricing over 2010-2012 as spot prices crashed due to a sovereign debt crisis in Europe, a shaky US recovery from the 2008 global financial crisis and China's sagging under the weight of ballooning domestic steel capacity.

While earlier annual benchmark negotiations were led mainly by major steelmakers in Japan and Europe, Chinese steelmakers had an increasing say through their activity in spot markets as growing steel capacity fueled their appetite for coking coal imports.

More than a decade on, the coking coal market has not looked back on its price indexation journey, although a new set of events – the pandemic, China's unofficial ban on Australian coal, erratic weather and the Russia-Ukraine war – may see a change of guard in terms of spot market activity, chiefly by India and Russia.

Brave old world

The path that coking coal embarked on in its indexation journey is a well-trodden one. Not only did iron ore pave the way a couple of years earlier, when then BHP Billiton CEO Marius Kloppers broke away from the annual benchmark system in favor of spot pricing – many other commodity markets effectively already had some form of floating price mechanism in place based on published price indices, including assessments published by Platts, part of S&P Global Commodity Insights.

While vestiges remain, as in the case of some semi-soft coal and pulverized coal injection contracts which are set via quarterly negotiated fixed prices in Northeast Asia, the wave of indexation has been inexorable.

The implicit understanding in the coking coal market was that BHP, as the biggest producer of coking coal, would dedicate a portion of output to the spot market to support price discovery, whether via bilateral negotiations or on trading platforms.

This unspoken compact was broadly seen to have served the market well, as long as a steady stream of spot supply flowed and allowed daily supply-demand fundamentals to determine where prices were assessed and published, which when averaged, let buyers and sellers effectively do away with long-drawn price negotiations.

The stage was therefore set, with one of the key conditions in the evolution of any commodity market toward proper price risk management fulfilled. The other key condition is the growth of a corresponding paper market for market participants to hedge their price exposure or speculate on future price directions.

Today, the metallurgical coal market has made inroads in index-linked pricing but is yet to see the derivative market develop to a meaningful size for efficient hedging and speculation.

Market participants see the low liquidity in the derivative market as a barrier to entry, although a chicken-and-egg problem presents in that some cite the low liquidity as precisely the reason why they are not entering the paper market.

China held sway as top buyer

Before China's unofficial ban on Australian coal imports in October 2020, it was the biggest spot buyer of seaborne metallurgical coal.

Leaning on rich domestic coal resources, Chinese buyers often tapped imports of seaborne coals opportunistically, especially premium brands with high coke strength after reaction and low volatile matter that served the needs of the ever-growing sizes of their blast furnaces, especially in coastal regions.

Chinese buyers were often seen as price leaders by buyers in the rest of the world, and deals, bids and offers they were involved in informed Platts CFR China assessments. Often, but not automatically, such information also informed Platts assessments on an FOB Australia basis via a freight netback, when it was determined that China was the marginal buyer of coals traded on this incoterm.

Not everyone, however, was thrilled with the idea of the Chinese market setting prices for the rest of the Asia-Pacific and even as far afield as Europe, where buying practices differed drastically.

Steelmakers in these so-called traditional markets operate mostly older coke- and iron-making facilities that limit flexibility in coal blending, and so prefer to lock in nearly all their requirements via term contracts to ensure security of supply.

Following China's unofficial ban on Australian coal imports, two key changes occurred. The first was the decoupling of the relationship between FOB Australia and CFR China prices.

The spread between Platts Premium Low Vol Hard Coking Coal CFR China and FOB Australia prices in 2019 averaged at $9.31/mt, according to S&P Global calculations.

This was very close to the average of Platts dry bulk freight assessments for metallurgical coal for the East Coast Australia-Northern China route over the same year, at $9.45/mt, indicating how closely related prices on both locational bases are.

But from November 2020 onwards, the CFR-FOB spread has widened in both directions, surging to a high of $218/mt in October 2021 after major rains flooded coal mines in the key province of Shanxi, and then plunging to minus $245/mt in March 2022 after the EU threatened to sanction Russian coal.

The market has not been a stranger to this phenomenon, as seen when Cyclone Debbie hit in 2017, which saw FOB Australia prices surge far above CFR China price levels.

Plunge in spot liquidity

The second major change was the sharp drop in spot liquidity observed, as steelmakers in other major importing economies like Europe, India and other parts of Northeast Asia willingly took up the coal that the Chinese gave up, not surprisingly, mainly via term contracts.

Spot transactions for premium hard coking coals on a CFR China basis observed by Platts slumped to just 4.12 million mt in 2021 from 27.32 million mt the previous year, and dropped further to 0.73 million mt in 2022, data compiled by Platts showed.

As a percentage of total output by BHP Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA), the world's top producer, Platts-observed spot deals of premium hard coking coals were at 19% in 2020, slipped to 13% the following year and then tumbled to just 6% in 2022.

In the first three months of 2023, observed spot deals accounted for 6% of BMA's production, indicating little change in the trend of thinning spot liquidity.

BHP, which markets all the coal produced by the joint venture, did not respond to an e-mailed request for comment.

The increased allocation of material to term contracts compounded a situation of reduced spot availability in 2022, when planned EU sanctions on Russian coal, inclement weather in Queensland that curtailed output and COVID-19-related labor shortages drove spot prices to a record high of $670.50/mt FOB Australia in March.

Even though term contracts ensured security of supply, spot-linked pricing meant that any tightness in spot material reverberated and was magnified in the price of term contractual volumes.

Enter India

Steelmakers in India, having undergone consolidations and all executing ambitious capacity expansions, comprised a key market segment that actively boosted term contractual purchasing, mainly due to a lack of domestic resources.

Leapfrogging China as the top importer of seaborne coking coal last year and being agnostic to Western sanctions on Russian coal and PCI, Indian steelmakers have come into their own and are now playing a more active role in the spot market.

When converting coal to coke did not make economic sense, JSW Steel for example sought to sell coking coal via real-time transparent tenders published by Platts, following a similar move by ArcelorMittal.

Indian buyers have also moved beyond being buyers of mainly mid-tier hard coking coals to become active buyers of premium hard coking coals from Australia and even North America.

What has driven their new-found appetite has been a tectonic shift in seaborne coking coal trade flows that has seen attractively priced Russian mid-tier coals being redirected by the Russia-Ukraine war to willing buyers mainly in India and China.

From a benchmarking perspective, India's emerging activity in the spot market for premium low-vol hard coking coals may see it exert greater influence over corresponding price assessments for that grade of coal, especially as it competes head-to-head with Chinese mills as the marginal buyer of Australian coals.

The next part of the series examines more closely the shifts in these trade flows and their impact.

Related content


Spain awards Eur76 mil to EV supply chain projects

Stellantis, Gestamp main awardees Eur1.6 billion awarded to date Spain’s government awarded Eur76 million ($82 million) in funding to 15 projects linked to the industrial supply chain of electric vehicles in its latest round of recovery funding, with Stellantis and Gestamp being the main winners, the industry ministry said May 10. Stellantis was awarded Eur29 million for its assembly plant in Vigo, while Gestamp was awarded Eur34 million for six EV component sites across Spain. The latest funding follows Eur170 million awarded in February , which included Eur130 million for Mercedes Benz's small van production and Eur10 million for Basquevolt’s solid-state battery development program. The entire PERTE VEC program started with Eur3.5 billion available, of which around Eur1.6 billion has been awarded to date across the first and second calls. A third call is looking to allocate Eur700 million during 2024, while a fourth call will start in H2 2024 with Eur1.2 billion to be made available. Platts, part of S&P Global Commodity Insights, assessed both battery-grade lithium carbonate and hydroxide at $14,800/mt CIF Europe May 10, down 6.3% and 6.9%, respectively, since the start of 2024. Platts Connect: News & Insights (


China’s new energy vehicle sales decline 4% on month in April

NEV sales account for 36% of total vehicle sales Lithium prices seen rangebound in near term China's new energy vehicle sales were down 3.7% on the month at 850,000 units in April, the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) said in a report late May 11. CAAM considers pure and hybrid electric vehicles as new energy vehicles. China’s NEV production reached 870,000 units in April, increasing 0.8% on the month to the highest level this year. End-users were on the sidelines amid a fierce price war among automakers that industry sources said was to blame for the decline in April sales. NEV output and sales in April respectively increased 35.9% and 33.5% year on year. NEV sales accounted for 36% of the country’s total vehicle sales in April, the highest on record, S&P Global Commodity Insights calculations showed. China’s total NEV output and sales were 2.99 million units and 2.94 million units in the first four months of 2024, rising 30.3% and 32.3% from the same period a year earlier, CAAM data showed. China’s NEV sales might increase in May on expectations of buying interest from end-users during the Labor Day holidays and government stimulus measures like vehicle trade-in policy and NEVs usage promotion in rural areas, industry sources said. Meanwhile, NEV exports reached 114,000 units in April, rising 13.3% from a year earlier but falling 8.6% from a month ago, CAAM data showed. China’s EV exports are expected to be promising in the longer term despite some near-term interruptions caused by Europe’s anti-subsidy investigation into Chinese NEV makers, industry sources said. Power battery output China’s output of power batteries and energy storage batteries, a key indicator of battery metals consumption, rose 3.2% month on month and 60% year on year to a total of 78.2 GWh in April, driven by increasing demand from NEV producers, according to data from the China Automobile Battery Innovation Alliance, or CABIA. Sales of power batteries and energy storage batteries were 73.5 GWh in April, rising 57% from a year earlier and 0.3% from a month ago, CABIA data showed. Nickel-cobalt-manganese materials used by power batteries and other batteries declined 6.2% from a month ago to 45,400 mt in April. Lithium iron phosphate materials consumed rose 7.8% month on month to 138,500 mt during the period. Lithium salts prices Chinese lithium salts prices may be rangebound in the short term, amid improved supply and demand, market sources said. Rising output from domestic producers and increasing imports are expected to boost supply in the domestic market. Meanwhile, production at downstream consumers is also expected to expand in May although the growth might be lower compared with April. Platts, part of S&P Global Commodity Insights, assessed battery-grade lithium carbonate at Yuan 107,000 ($14,791)/mt on a DDP China basis May 10, Yuan 6,000/mt lower on the month. Market participants have been keeping a close watch on the impact from an environmental protection supervision in Jiangxi, with the central inspection team in the province over May 8-June 8. Platts Connect: News & Insights (


Fluence Energy expects to ride US battery boom as storage capacity grows: executives

Executives call storage boom 'tremendous opportunity' California, Texas driving US capacity growth Fluence Energy anticipates a significant increase in battery storage demand in the US, executives said, highlighting a strong pipeline and new products as the company narrowed its net loss. CEO Julian Jose Nebreda Marquez said on a May 9 earnings call that the company “continues to see strong growth in demand for utility-scale energy storage systems.” The company’s pipeline increased by 22%, or $2.9 billion, quarter on quarter. The first quarter saw an order intake of 2.2 new GWh in the company’s “Solutions” segment, 0.9 GWh in the “Services” segment and 3.1 GW in the “Digital” segment, totaling about $713 million of new orders, according to the company. The US Inflation Reduction Act is driving storage demand, Marquez said. The battery storage space is “well insulated from the upcoming US elections” and the company does expect significant demand impacts from it, he added. “The United States is our largest market,” he said. “Battery and storage is playing an increasingly vital role in the US as the nation seeks to modernize its energy infrastructure, enhanced grid resilience and transition towards cleaner and more sustainable sources of power.” The company’s earning reports highlighted growth in battery storage demand in ERCOT, CAISO and MISO in the US, as well as Chile, Germany and Australia, which is becoming the “second most important market globally.” Fluence announced this week a new more “energy-dense” product aimed at increasing efficiency and accommodating customers with space restraints, executives said on the call. The newest product in the Gridstack series has 5-6 MWh in a 20-foot enclosure, Marquez said on the call. The company saw a net loss of about $12.9 million, compared to a loss of $37.4 million in the same quarter last year. US battery storage capacity is expected to surpass 30 GW this year, the US Energy Information Administration said Jan. 9. About 8.5 GW of new battery facilities are expected, according to an S&P Global Commodity Insights forecast. California and Texas are driving capacity growth. The states were the top two in operating battery storage capacity, with California at 8.3 GW and Texas at 5.1 GW, as of fourth quarter 2023, according to government filings and company announcements that Commodity Insights compiled. Arizona was ranked third in Commodity Insight's Q4 data at 938 MW. The top three states combined made up 83% of the total storage across all states, according to the data. Marquez cited projections of nearly 350 GWh of new capacity being added by 2030. “This is a tremendous opportunity,” he said. Platts Connect: News & Insights (


Ramp-up of AMG's lithium operations remains on track despite price volatility

Output at Brazilian lithium concentrate plant to reach 130,000 mt/year during Q4 Lithium hydroxide refinery in Germany to delivery first production batches during Q3 Q1 sales of lithium concentrate fell 24% due to shipping variations Miner and lithium supplier AMG Critical Materials has announced that the expansion of its mining operations in Brazil and the ramp-up of its conversion plant Germany remains on schedule despite ongoing volatility in global lithium markets. In a statement marking the release of the company’s first quarter 2024 results on May 7, AMG said that its lithium expansion strategy remains on-track with the company able to access approximately $600 million in capital following a $100 million term loan expansion secured at the end of April. In Brazil, AMG said that the expansion of its lithium concentrate is progressing as planned with the plant expected to reach a full nameplate capacity of 130,000mt/year during Q4 2024, up from a previous capacity 90,000 mt/year. In Germany, the company said that the ramp-up of its lithium hydroxide refinery in Bitterfeld remains on track with the first production batches expected to be shipped out to clients during Q3 2024. AMG plans to produce 20,000 mt/year of battery-grade lithium hydroxide at the plant in the first module, with four additional modules planned to achieve a total production capacity of 100,000 mt/year. In its Q1 results AMG reported quarterly sales of lithium concentrate at 15,652 dmt, some 24% lower than the 20,509 dmt sold during Q1 2023 with the company citing shipping variances in 2023. “Volumes were negatively impacted by shipments that arrived in the fourth quarter of 2023 to the detriment of our first quarter 2024 volumes,” it said. The average realized sales price was $1,163/dmt CIF China for the quarter at an average cost of $616/dmt CIF China. EBITDA during the quarter fell 71% on the year to 31 million which the company attributed to the decline in lithium and vanadium prices. “The average quarterly prices of lithium carbonate and ferrovanadium, the material prices that most significantly impact our financial results, decreased 76% and 33%, respectively, versus the average pricing in the first quarter of 2023,” the company said. With the ramp-up of the lithium concentrate plant, AMG said that the cost per ton will rise relative to historical costs during Q2 2024 due to unabsorbed costs during the ramp-up and lower tantalum sales volumes offsetting higher spodumene production. “Long-term demand trends are encouraging, and additional supply prospects are confronting challenging constraints throughout the industry,” said CEO Heinz Schimmelbusch. “Our low-cost position allows us to endure the current market conditions and prosper considerably at more normalized price levels.” Platts, part of S&P Global Commodity Insights, assessed lithium hydroxide CIF Europe at $14,800/mt May 7, down from $15,900/mt on Jan. 2. Platts Connect: News & Insights (