Asian LNG importers seek cargo deferrals as storage terminals report tank tops

Banner Image

Asian LNG importers are experiencing high inventory levels and tank-tops, which refers to storage terminals reaching full capacity, on the back of a mild start to the winter season that has slowed downstream natural gas consumption, according to several traders and market participants.

The tank-top situation is expected to be bearish for spot LNG prices and is resulting in LNG importers taking measures to delay shipments by extending the waiting time for LNG carriers or asking suppliers to push delivery dates further out until terminal capacity is available.

Asian spot LNG prices have eased from recent highs when it was trading at over $50/MMBtu in August. Platts assessed JKM for December at $24.330/MMBtu Nov. 10. While it is still elevated, it's dropping to a range where more importers could be incentivized to boost procurement.

South Korea's key LNG importer Kogas is facing tank-top, market sources in the country said. If the weather remains warmer than usual in Asia and demand in Europe does not pick up soon, the vessel congestions could get worse, they added.

Some entities may need to defer the delivery window or rent other terminals to receive the term volumes in the event of a tank-top, a South Korean market participant said.

At least one Japanese power utility said that it has chosen a later delivery window for its December delivery cargo because there's a high chance that high inventory levels will continue into next month. A second Japanese utility confirmed that its supplier had agreed to its request to delay the delivery of its cargo until December as downstream demand has not been that strong so far.

Japanese month-end LNG stocks have been hovering above both year-on-year and the five-year average since May, according to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and latest data showed that Japanese power utilities had 2.53 million mt LNG stock at the end of October, compared with 2.66 million mt at the end of September.

"We have a cargo discharging in late December, but a buyer is requesting to have it delivered in January instead," a Japanese trader said separately.

China and India

China used to be the last resort for most Asian LNG buyers who purchased surplus LNG cargoes ahead of the peak winter season, to sell cargoes at discount, but this outlet may not emerge this year as demand has been sluggish.

On Nov. 9, PipeChina posted data showing spare LNG receiving capacity at its seven affiliated LNG terminals for December would be 6.5% higher than previously estimated, indicating underutilized terminal capacity. While lower Chinese LNG imports have been due to weak downstream demand and regulated gas prices, traders said December could see high inventory levels as well.

"We are facing tanktop now because of some issues at Tianjin terminal, and cannot afford to add any more injections to our underground storage tanks. We want to issue a sell tender or offer cargoes but are concerned that weather remains mild and deferred cargoes arrive earlier [when storage is not available]," Chinese traders said.

Other Chinese traders indicated that natural gas storage tanks in central and north China were high, but not to the extent of tank top.

"Weather is warmer, so domestic downstream consumption is quite slow, but it could be colder towards late winter. A lot more cargoes being offered for the prompt in December could be floated into January," one of the traders said.

Meanwhile, even in India, which has seen a sharp drop in spot LNG imports this year, importers have reported a tank-top situation at some terminals. Petronet LNG's Dahej LNG terminal and Shell's Hazira terminal are requesting end users to evacuate gas at a higher rate and postpone cargo deliveries by 3-4 days, Indian traders said.


  • LNG

  • Shipping

Related content


Interactive: Seaborne trade in Russian oil under G7 price cap

Russia, one of the world’s largest oil suppliers, has increasingly turned to non-Western firms to transport its crude to overseas buyers during its ongoing war with Ukraine . With a dual goal of undermining Russia’s war chest without creating significant disruptions to global supplies amid inflation pressure, G7 countries and their allies have banned tanker operators, insurers and other services firms from facilitating seaborne Russian crude exports unless the barrels are sold for no more than $60/b. The price cap regime, which came into force Dec. 5, 2022, does not directly cover tankers flagged, owned and operated by companies outside the G7, the EU, Australia, Switzerland and Norway, and not insured by Western protection and indemnity clubs. While such ships tend to be older and less maintained, their share in Russia’s crude exports market has been rising in recent months amid strengthening prices of Urals -- the OPEC+ member’s flagship crude grade -- and tightening sanctions enforcement by the West. Non-price-capped tankers have a larger market share in shipping Russia’s Pacific crude exports, according to analysis of S&P Global Commodities at Sea and Maritime Intelligence Risk Suite data. Crudes such as Sokol, Sakhalin Blend, and Eastern Siberia–Pacific Ocean grades are more often involved in these trades than Russian barrels from Baltic or Black Sea ports like Urals. Tanker operators in Greece, Europe’s top shipowning nation, managed to keep their traditionally strong market position in Russia in the first few months since the price cap took effect before giving ways to their peers in the UAE, Russia, China and Hong Kong. (Latest update: April 5, 2024)


Infographic: Oil trade adjusts to Red Sea turmoil despite latest attacks

Red Sea shipping volumes have slumped more than 60% since November as vessels opt for the longer Cape route to avoid Houthi attacks. But even as the severity of the attacks mounts, freight rates have retreated from recent highs and oil-on-water may have peaked as trade flows adjust. Click to see the full-size infographic


Red Sea turmoil has so far spared oil supplies, but buyers have reasons to worry

A series of attacks on shipping routes in the Red Sea has so far spared oil supplies from witnessing major disruptions, but oil importing countries are spending sleepless nights amid concerns that any escalation could potentially alter the situation drastically. Although the attacks disrupted container shipping lines, oil shipments remain largely stable. However, concerns stem from the fact that supply chains will likely have to adjust very quickly should the disruption persist. As existing oil tanker contracts are often hard to change, some ongoing traffic will continue to move through Red Sea passages. Any new insurance issued for Red Sea routes could add about $1/b or more to voyage costs, according to S&P Global Commodity Insights. Re-routing will increase voyage length, in-transit times and fuel costs. In addition, it will result in higher vessel utilizations, which could lift global freight rates as well as widen inter-regional crude spreads. Surely, more ships are avoiding the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab strait after a spate of attacks by Yemen's Houthi militants, threatening the strategic chokepoint for global seaborne trade. Many shippers, tanker owners and some oil companies have suspended voyages through the area. Russia's oil exports are particularly exposed to further Red Sea disruptions as Moscow ships some 80% of its crude to Asian markets. The attacks are expected to keep insurance costs high and prompt many tankers to take the longer route via the Cape of Good Hope, increasing ton miles and voyage durations, as well as tightening supplies and driving up freight rates. Even for the route via the Suez Canal, higher fees effective this year combined with a carbon tax for Europe-bound cargoes, will increase overall costs for charterers. Special report: Taking the long way around: Ships divert from the Panama Canal Although the rerouting of tankers away from the Red Sea, a major conduit for oil loaded in Russia, will surely raise shipping costs, the impact will be transitory. Roughly 7 million-8 million b/d of crude oil and products transited the Red Sea in recent months, according to S&P Global data. The market, for sure, will adjust to the changing flows, but the re-routing will lead to more oil on the water for a longer period of time. Russian crude shipments, should they avoid the Red Sea, are most affected due to a much longer haul to Asia around Africa. And amid tighter fleet capacity, lingering geopolitical conflicts are expected to boost tanker freight in 2024 despite ongoing OPEC+ supply cuts and a possible slowdown in oil demand growth. Implications for Asia As the biggest oil importing region, Asia may not witness dramatic changes to near-term oil supplies amid the ongoing Red Sea crisis, but refiners are chalking out alternative plans to ensure steady feedstock flows in the event of an escalation, a move that could inflate insurance costs and crimp refining margins. Although the region relies on imported oil for the bulk of its needs, the strategic push among Asia's top importers to massively diversify their import baskets over the years, as well as expand strategic storage, will come in handy to ensure smooth and uninterrupted flow of feedstocks. The Red Sea crisis has three aspects to it, as far as Asian oil flows are concerned. First, any escalation will create hurdles for Russian crude flowing to Asia, forcing buyers to look for substitutes from other origins. Secondly, for products moving from Asia to Europe, exporters are cautiously watching developments before taking the plunge. And lastly, longer routes have the potential to create incremental bunker fuel demand in Asia. Oil flows into China have not been impacted much by the Red Sea turbulence, as fewer cargoes are headed there on that route. In addition, the impact on Russian oil flows to India has been minimal, with no major diversions seen so far. Russia contributed over 35% of India's total crude imports in 2023, amounting to 1.7 million b/d, according to S&P Global data. Asian oil buyers are not necessarily concerned about Middle Eastern sour crude supplies for 2024, as major sellers, including Saudi Aramco and Abu Dhabi National Oil Co., fully respect Asian customers' demand regardless of their production cut commitments. However, the economics for cracking Middle Eastern sour crude have been deteriorating as the costs of bringing Persian Gulf barrels to the Far East have been rising with shippers demanding risk premiums, while tanker insurance costs are also trending higher. Asian refiners may even look at cutting Middle Eastern term contractual volumes and explore other options like African, US and South American crudes to maximize margins. US crudes, for one, is becoming increasingly more attractive for Asian refiners as the price of lighter and sweeter WTI crude is nearly on par with high-sulfur Persian Gulf grades on a delivered basis. Supply cushion The attacks in the Red Sea continued even after the US-led alliance took military action to establish deterrence. The risk of a wider escalation also increased with Pakistan's retaliatory strikes against Iran for alleged Iranian militant attacks in Pakistan. Overall, the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have only increased over the weeks. However, oil markets have largely shrugged aside the risk due to a lack of physical disruption to oil shipments and weak macro fundamentals. But increased risk in the Middle East is probably putting a floor to oil prices amid weak demand. S&P Global expects fundamentals to improve in the second half of 2024 and prices to move up. Still, OPEC+ market management and the alignment between Saudi Arabia and Russia on OPEC+ policy will be critical for oil markets in 2024. S&P Global forecasts Platts Dated Brent to average $83/b in 2024 and $76/b in 2025. A sharper economic slowdown or disagreement within OPEC+ on production restrain remains the biggest risk for oil markets going into 2024. By: Sambit Mohanty, Editorial Lead, Asia Energy News, S&P Global Commodity Insights, S & P Global Commodity Insights Further reading: Red Sea shipping risk


Infographic: What China’s lower GDP growth means for 2024 commodity demand

China on Jan. 17 released its 2023 GDP growth at 5.2%, meeting its target set in March last year. S&P Global projects China’s 2024 GDP growth to slow to 4.7% after the country's annual economic conference held in December implied that any fiscal and monetary measures taken in 2024 were unlikely to be more aggressive than in 2023. This sets a weak tone for commodity markets in terms of end-user demand. Click here to see the full size version