Indigenous carbon forestry carves niche market

Banner Image
Native tree-based carbon forestry has created a specialized market as premiums rise, Kshitiz Goliya writes.

Carbon forestry projects growing tree species native to a particular area are emerging as a niche nature-based solution in the carbon credit market and attracting premiums over credits generated from plantations growing exotic or commercial trees.

While plantation-based carbon projects can sequester carbon faster in the initial years due to fast growth and generate additional revenue through timber, their carbon accumulation saturates in the long run.

On the other hand, native trees tend to grow slower but deliver credits over a long period as they continue growing for as long as 40 years.

"When we look at it from an investment point of view, the native species for conservation are likely to be able to demand higher prices in the market for their credits, mainly because of the biodiversity co-benefits that are associated with it," said Adam Gibbon, natural capital lead at AXA Investment Managers, part of the French insurance giant AXA.

Gibbon added, however, that buyers also recognize the need to support plantations to reduce the pressure on existing forests for the supply of wood, which will be essential in the shift away from the petrochemicals industry. About 14 million credits were issued in January-August based on natural carbon capture methods, with 6.56 million retired, according to data from S&P Global Commodity Insights. A total of 182 million credits were issued over the same months from all types of projects.

The key concern among buyers is how long carbon is going to stay out of the atmosphere, said Peter Fernandez, founder and CEO of Mombak, a nature-based carbon removal startup focused on the Amazon in Brazil.

"If you have a monoculture, the answer is probably not very long," Fernandez said. "If the wrong disease or the wrong pest shows up, it can kill your entire forest because they’re all the same tree."

There used to be a strong push for monoculture, with fast-growing non-native species plantations under the UN-backed Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) carbon credit scheme. It led to a backlash in the market, said Jeffrey Chatellier, CEO of Forest Carbon, a Jakarta-based carbon project developer planting native species on degraded land in Sumatra.

Non-native tree species create risks for a restoration project as they could outcompete other species on which a lot of local biodiversity depends for sustenance, Chatellier said.

"When you start disrupting that, it can lead to a sort of extinction – not as a species, but in that zone," he added. "A lot of those niche species would cease to exist because of the promotion of non-native trees." Carbon projects like World Vision’s Sodo in Ethiopia have seen the return of birds and baboons to the project area after the land was allowed to be regenerated with native vegetation, said Rob Kelly, acting manager for climate action and resilience at the developer.

Premiums and returns
Carbon credits from natural carbon capture methods, such as forestry, already attract one of the highest prices among carbon market project methods.

Platts, part of S&P Global Commodity Insights, assessed the price of natural carbon capture at $13.45/mtCO2e on September 29.

Native tree-based forestry projects continue to attract a premium over plantation-based projects, with prices ranging from $14/mtCO2e to above $50/ mtCO2e, depending on the co-benefits from the project, market participants told S&P Global.

The magnitude of the premium also depends on the volume, with smaller parcels getting higher prices compared with large direct-offtake deals.

"If we talk about relevant significant volume transactions of, let’s say, 5,000 mt or more, the highest price we have seen was $28/mtCO2e," said Julian Ekelhof, senior director for climate solutions at Forliance, a Germany-based project developer and broker.

The price for smaller volumes of as low as 5 mt, which can be bought on the Gold Standard platform, can rise to as high as $45-$50/mtCO2e, Ekelhof added.

"When you start dealing with big volumes of credit, the buyers look at their cost," said Clement Chenost, managing partner at the Shared Wood Company, a Paris-based forestry project developer. "Maybe they can pay once for a credit at $50, but when you talk about 1 million credits, the negotiation is much tougher.

Fernandez said Mombak is in talks to sign a large offtake deal for its native tree-based carbon credits with "one of the largest companies in the world" at more than $50/mtCO2e and the deal will account for about 30% of its total production.

"All of the rest of the carbon we will sell in the spot market in the future because we believe that the price has a very bullish outlook," he said.

Compliance signal
While most of the native tree-based credits continue to rely on demand from the voluntary carbon markets, some countries are using their compliance regime to push forestry in a more sustainable direction.

The concerns over carbon markets fueling monoculture-based projects reached a tipping point in 2022 in New Zealand, where the emissions trading scheme allows forestry developers to earn allowances for sequestering carbon.

To offset the risks from projects largely populated by exotic pine trees, the government is undertaking a consultation on whether to mandate some long-term forestry projects registered within the ETS to transition to native trees.

France in July published a decree under its Label Bas Carbone, or low-carbon label, voluntary certification scheme that incentivizes local airlines to offset their emissions through credits from biodiverse forestry projects.

"If they buy a certificate with co-benefits, instead of having to compensate 1 mt, they have to compensate half a ton, meaning it’s basically a premium of 50%," Chenost said.
Barriers and risks

Some native tree-based forestry projects carry risks in the form of the survival rate on degraded land, the lack of infrastructure for seedlings, limited revenue streams and low knowledge base.

"Nature-based solutions as a sector has not matured to the same scale as plantation forestry, so the key thing is you need access to seed, you need teams that can identify seed, know how to treat the seeds, and how to start managing nurseries at scale," Chatellier said.

Brazil, which has seen a surge in forestry projects, is facing similar bottlenecks. Native tree-based reforestation projects in the country used to be handled mostly by non-government organizations.

While NGOs have the capacity to plant 3,000 hectares/year, they will not be able to scale up to 10,000 hectares, said Felipe Viana, sales director at Carbonext, a Sao Paulo-based project developer and credit seller.

There is also an increased risk in planting native species at scale due to limited research and experience compared with commercial plantations.

There has been as much as 50 years of research on exotic pine forestry, but only about 10 years for native trees, said Mitchell McLaughlin, co-founder of New Zealand-based MyNativeForest, adding that the company is working to lower the cost of planting through more research.

Fernandez, whose company is bringing a tech centered approach to scaling reforestation rapidly, said the supply of seeds can be managed by professional procurement. Land titles are a bigger challenge.

"We have to invest in a lot of people and technology to do very thorough due diligence on every piece of land that we look at to make sure that we have bulletproof land titles," he said.

Potential buyers
The demand for credits from native tree-based projects has increased as more companies seek to offset their emissions with credits that have co-benefits.

World Vision, which also operates the Humbo carbon project in Ethiopia, said the prices were low before 2018 when it was selling credits to the World Bank under the CDM scheme.

Both Sodo and Humbo are based on the farmer-managed natural regeneration method, which involves assisting the growth of remnants of native vegetation by removing human and animal pressure on the land.

The project was able to attract higher prices after it transitioned to Gold Standard in 2018.

"We’re returning on average 65%-70% of carbon revenue back into the hands of the communities," said Kelly.

The demand for native tree-based credits was especially higher from the luxury goods and technology companies as well as consumer goods companies whose supply chains run through forestry, market participants said.

"I think as we move toward 2030, we will see a lot of supply constraints and upward price pressure on both but I still would expect the native species to be an even rarer commodity and hence with those added co-benefits commanding higher prices," Gibbon said.

This article first appeared in the October 2023 issue of Commodity Insights Magazine


  • Agriculture

  • Energy Transition

  • LNG

  • Gas & Power

  • Chemicals

  • Shipping

Related content

Thought Leadership

Interactive: Platts SAF-Jet Fuel blend price

Sustainable Aviation Fuel is being blended with conventional aviation fuel in increasing percentages. Mandated blend volumes and voluntary targets across the globe are aiming to tackle the challenge of decarbonizing aviation. The S&P Global SAF-Jet fuel blend slider uses the month average Platts CIF Northwest Europe Jet cargo price benchmark and the CIF ARA SAF price assessment to show a representation of the blended price of aviation fuel.

Thought Leadership

Interactive: The Platts Benchmark Heatmap

The price wall visualizes 258 of the most important price benchmarks assessed by Platts across various commodities from crude through to chemicals, LNG and carbon. The wall shows the price performance of these benchmarks over 2023 based on their indexed value from the first day of trading. Click on the commodity button to isolate different groups of resources to see which performed best in 2023, a year that saw dramatic changes in trade flows and demand because of sanctions and price caps on Russian commodities and a recovering post-COVID global economy. Isolate individual benchmarks by clicking on the tile to reveal a unique QR code to navigate to specific Platts methodology pages and average price data for 2022 and 2023. Click to start exploring

Thought Leadership

Fueling the Future: Biofuels driving progress on net zero

The role of biofuels in energy transition is growing, as they can help decarbonize hard-to-abate transport sectors, but more supply is needed to keep the world on track with net-zero goals. S&P Global Commodity Insights explores how regional policies are driving adoption and evolving technology is widening the feedstock pool, as well as supply and demand outlooks across transport sectors. READ MORE

Thought Leadership

INTERVIEW: Upstream investments crucial for 'just transition' to cleaner fuels: Invenire Energy

India must keep investing in the upstream sector to ensure higher oil and gas production to avoid possible supply problems or volatile energy prices, as it embraces technologies that are more environment friendly, Mannish Mahesshwari, CEO of Invenire Energy, told S&P Global Commodity Insights. "Flipping the lens to energy security, sustained under investment in upstream without substitutional capacity and substantial scale in clean and new energy could have far reaching consequences in the journey of just transition," Mahesshwari said on the sidelines of the India Energy Week in Goa. Most of assets of private equity backed Invenire are discovered fields in India that the company has acquired through secondary market purchases from other firms as well as through primary acquisitions directly from the government. The company also has assets in Indonesia and East Africa. The private upstream firm is looking to accelerate production of oil and gas from the discovered fields in its portfolio but has no plans to venture into exploration in the foreseeable future. "We are putting our money where our mind is. As a company, our ability to understand the rocks and the molecules is relatively better than the electrons. We are investing in today's energy system, which is mainly oil and helping in phasing out coal with the help of low-carbon gas," Mahesshwari said. He said that the transition to a world of net zero is more certain today than envisaged in 2015, the year of the Paris Agreement. However, it is the uncertainty around the energy transition pace that adds complexity and risk for upstream projects. The upstream industry has been avoiding spending on projects that would either lock in heavy emissions for years to come or quickly turn into stranded assets. Right focus Invenire currently holds stakes in nine blocks in India. Out of these, four are discovered small fields (DSF) blocks -- one in Assam and three in Mumbai offshore -- comprising a total of about 100 million barrels equivalent of oil and gas. Invenire holds a 100% stake in the four DSF acreages. The company has a small production portfolio of about 12,000 b/d but has plans to boost that volume to 35,000 b/d by 2025. According to S&P Global, Invenire Energy's upstream plans show ambition and promise, considering the wider competitive landscape in India. The company's experience of operating in a tough post-2014 upstream period that saw oil prices slump will certainly influence its post-2023 growth ambitions. For assets outside India, the company might have plans to become a non-operator joint venture partner to take stakes in small-to-medium sized producing assets. The company's focus has been on monetizing discovered resources, having both operator and non-operator portfolios, S&P Global said. Besides India, Invenire has producing fields with 45.55% participating interest in a material acreage located in South Sumatra Basin in Indonesia. "The upstream industry's main focus now is to deliver the supply required to meet demand. Most of the industry's oil and gas investment for the rest of this decade will target advantaged resources -- those with the lowest cost, least risk, and possibly lowest Scope 1 emissions. Beyond this decade, to meet demand, the industry will depend increasingly on late-life reserves growth from legacy supply sources." Mahesshwari said. Similar views Mahesshwari's views echoed comments made by state-run upstream producers ONGC Ltd. and Oil India Ltd. at the IEW conference. ONGC Ltd., which contributes about 74% of India's crude oil and around 63% of its natural gas production, has been actively looking to widen its upstream portfolio as it believes that oil and gas will be a major component of the country's energy mix for the next three decades, while pursuing new crude-to-chemicals projects to prepare for the changing energy landscape, its Chairperson Arun Kumar Singh told the conference. Oil India Ltd. is aiming to double its exploration acreage in the coming years and seeking partnerships to realize the hydrocarbon potential of offshore regions in Indian sedimentary basins, its Chairman and Managing Director Ranjit Rath said. Mahesshwari said that there is a need to take a balanced view of energy transition, adding that any shortfall in upstream investments can add to supply issues and volatile energy prices, as seen in recent years. While it's important to keep looking for opportunities to invest in low-carbon businesses, continuing to responsibly invest in the core upstream business will remain the priority for the company in the foreseeable future. "The potential in carbon capture utilization and storage is enormous, and the oil and gas sector has unique skills that make it ideally placed to lead in reducing CO2 and methane emissions and decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors through carbon upcycling," Mahesshwari said.